Monday, February 17, 2020

Review: Joan of Arc: A History

Joan of Arc: A History

My rating: 3 of 5 stars

Throughout history there have been figures that have risen meteorically only to come crashing to earth very quickly. In all of medieval European history, no figure rose so dramatically or fell so quickly as Joan of Arc, the teenage peasant girl who claimed to hear voices from angels and saints and rallied the battered French forces against the invading English. And despite her precipitous fall, few other figures from this time have endured in popular imagination. So, who was she, what exactly did she do, and was she the real deal or a delusional peasant? In this book, Helen Castor seeks to inject some flesh and blood into this enduring myth.

If this is your first time reading about Joan of Arc, it is important to note that this book is not a straight, cradle-to-grave biography. This book rather puts Joan in her historical context by going all the way back to the invasion of France by that equally famous figure from this period, King Henry V of England, and proceeding from there. In the first act, Ms. Castor shows how, through the English invasion and internal divisions of the French court, much of northern France fell into English hands. This is incredibly valuable context, but it can be rather complicated too. There is a great deal of medieval politics and backstabbing going on that Ms. Castor does not always do a great job of explaining. The point Ms. Castor makes by the end though is that things look incredibly bleak for the French by the time Joan arrives at court.

When Joan does arrive and the French decide to give her an army, things dramatically change. Joan lifts the siege of the critical city of Orleans and begins to push the English back with a handful of victories that look something akin to miracles. Ms. Castor does a great job of explaining how Joan, a teenage peasant girl with no military experience claiming to hear messages from God, got an audience with the Dauphin and began to push the English back, but she doesn't do a great job of explaining why the French would entrust her with an army in the first place. At the same time, to preserve the linear story she is telling about this period in history, Ms. Castor doesn't tell us anything about Joan's background until her capture and trial at the hands of the English. On top of that, one of the more frustrating parts about his book is the fact that there are no campaign or battle maps included. There is only one map that shows the status quo in France just prior to Joan's arrival at court. While it is a detailed map, I found myself having to refer to that one map over and over again and not always finding where everyone was. Even some simple black and white maps inserted into the text would've helped a great deal.

The last major aspect of Joan's story Ms. Castor deals with is her trial, execution, and then retrial decades later. The popular myth of Joan's trial is that it was a hit job designed to pass a guilty verdict upon a girl who had become such a nuisance to the English so quickly. The story Ms. Castor relates though is one where the jurists were deadly serious about Joan's potential heresy and genuinely were trying to correct her error and save her soul and her life. Though things do not end well for Joan, her retrial decades later casts aspersions on that first trial. Thus, by the end of the book, I was left with two contradictory thoughts about Joan's trial, that it was both a preordained hit job and a sincere search for the truth of her claims. Ms. Castor does not really giver her own analysis and opinions about the whole matter, leaving it up to the reader to decide for themselves.

Ultimately, this book is a great introduction to the period. By the end of it, I had a better understanding of the times Joan lived in and just how vital a role she played in turning back the English invasion, even though she only campaigned for a little over a year and would not live to see France recovered by the French. And yet, I still feel as though there were big gaps left unexplained. Ms. Castor doesn't do enough to dispel the confusion that reigned prior to Joan's arrival. And while a great deal of Joan's history is answered in this book, I am still left with a great number of questions, the biggest one being whether or not Joan was the real deal, a person who was chosen by God to deliver France from the English, or just a delusional peasant girl. Ms. Castor never even attempts to answer that question and, perhaps, there is no definitive answer to that question. Still, an attempt at answering that question would've been nice. I would recommend this book to anyone interested in reading an introduction to Joan of Arc and her times. Just don't expect all of your questions to be answered by the end of it.

Wednesday, February 12, 2020

God is Change: A Review of Parable of the Sower by Octavia Butler

Parable of the Sower

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

Once again, I find myself being drawn to bleak speculative fiction and books don't get much bleaker than this. I've heard it compared to George Orwell's 1984 and Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale, and truly this is one of the great modern classics of dystopian fiction that feels a little too prophetic for comfort.

Set in 2024 Southern California, America is right on the edge of societal collapse. Rule of law is virtually non-existent, politicians promise to restore the country's greatness, but everyone is let to fend for themselves. Living in the middle of this is Lauren Olamina, a teenage girl born with hyperempathy, the ability to feel another person's pain. As the world and her walled-off community continue to crumble, Lauren rejects the religion her father and begins to develop one of her own based on the central idea that God is change. When her walls are breached, Lauren and her followers must trek across the broken landscape of California to find a new home.

This is an incredibly bleak novel. Nothing and no one ever stay safe for long and people are hurt or killed in horrible ways. The fact that our main character can feel that pain makes it worse. But what is so striking about this book is how it eerily parallels the future. The politician promising to restore America's greatness sounds an awful lot like Pres. Trump on the stump. And the main cause of societal breakdown, climate change, is unfolding itself before our eyes in many places around the world. And the fact that Ms. Butler wrote this book back in 1993 is all the more striking.

Though this book could be read swiftly, you really should take your time. Ms. Butler writes very compellingly anther descriptions of how to navigate a post-apocalyptic landscape are incredible. 

This is truly a gripping read and one that fans of post apocalyptic novels like Cormac McCarthy's The Road should not miss.

Saturday, February 8, 2020

Quantum Heist: A Review of Randomize by Andy Weir

Randomize Randomize by Andy Weir
My rating: 4 of 5 stars

Andy Weir seemingly shot out of nowhere to become one of the biggest contemporary sci-fi authors with his book The Martian. With his blend of realistic science and dark humor, I fell completely in love with it and recommended it to so many people. I even loved the Ridley Scott movie adaptation that came out later. When an author becomes an overnight sensation, the next questions people ask is what will they write next and will it be just as good as his first work. While I have yet to read Mr. Weir's sophomore novel, Artemis (I'm getting to it!), after reading this short story, I do believe that Mr. Weir's narrative powers will hold up just fine over a long and promising career.

Set in a Las Vegas casino in the near future, Mr. Weir relates a tale of a high-risk, high-reward heist. The thieves though are not a bunch of hardened master criminals straight out of Ocean's Eleven, but a brilliant husband and wife team with an intimate knowledge of quantum mechanics, quantum computing, and how it can be used to rig a Keno game. In less than 30 pages, Mr. Weir both engages the reader with his heist story and does a fairly good job of explaining quantum mechanics and computing to novices like me. And, like Mr. Weir's other characters, when the chips are down the characters in this book must rely on their wits to get themselves out. Like his other works, Mr. Weir makes being smart cool and completely necessary to succeed.

One thing that is lacking from this book is Mr. Weir's signature humor. While none of the characters are particularly dour, neither are any of them particularly humorous. Of course, not every Andy Weir work has to be funny, but, especially towards the end, a little humor to break the tension would have been appreciated.

Overall, this is an excellent short story that one can knock out in about an hour. For anyone who has been hesitant to pick up an Andy Weir novel, this could be a good introduction to one of the best sci-fi authors working today.

View all my reviews

Friday, February 7, 2020

Pig’s Rule: A Review of Animal Farm by George Orwell

Animal Farm Animal Farm by George Orwell
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

As the current political times we live in have gotten darker and darker, like many people I keep finding myself coming back to classic dystopian novels to gain insights and even inspiration. There are plenty of classics to choose from, such as Brave New World and The Handmaid's Tale, but I recall being truly frightened by George Orwell's vision of totalitarianism in 1984. So, I am a little ashamed that it has taken me so long to get to this wonderful novel about revolution and the slow slide back into tyranny that can result.

Taking place on a farm in the English countryside, operated by the cruel and incompetent drunk Mr. Jones, Orwell relates a simple tale of farm animals fed up with their oppression who, though talking about it for some time, join together to overthrow their oppressor in an unplanned moment of anger. Finding themselves free human oppression for the first time, the farm animals write down a list of rules to govern themselves and work hard to make their farm prosperous for all. But, as dissension forms between the two pigs who act as leaders, and as one of those pigs moves swiftly to make himself the sole ruler and beneficiary of the farm's wealth, the animals find themselves in a tyranny just as oppressive as the one they overthrew.

While this basic plot is pretty common in the annals of revolutionary history (for those interested in the history of revolutions, you should definitely check out the Revolutions Podcast), what makes this book an instant classic is how Orwell relates the tale so simply. Despite the book being about farm animals, the allegorical nature of this book makes it accessible to just about everyone. Heck, you could even read this book to children as it is told in such a simple and accessible form that anyone can instantly understand what Orwell was trying to do.

Reading this book also reminded me of why dystopian novels are so important in dark political times. Throughout the book the dictatorial pigs keep repeatedly telling lies or tacking on lies to the truth in order to fool the farm animals and keep themselves in power. As I was reading this book, I couldn't help but compare what the pigs were doing to what some current politicians are doing today. This also marks Animal Farm as a classic. It doesn't matter when you read it, the truths Orwell conveys about how the high ideals of a revolution can be subverted by the lies of the greedy are just as true today as they were in 1946.

Just as 1984 was such an enjoyable, if frightening, read, so too is this book. For those who have been wanting to jump into dystopian political novels, I would highly recommend this to you as your first book.

View all my reviews

Thursday, February 6, 2020

Bully for America! A Review of The Bully Pulpit by Doris Kearns Goodwin

The Bully Pulpit: Theodore Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, and the Golden Age of Journalism

My rating: 4 of 5 stars

One of the most persistent and pressing problems in recent U.S. history has been the ever widening gap between the rich and poor, the growing power of large corporations at the expense of workers, and the government's inability (or unwillingness) to address the problem seriously. Populist candidates on both the political right and left have gained a great deal of traction by criticizing our current state of affairs. As we face another election where the fate of Progressive politics for the next generation will be on the line, it is good to turn back the clock to a period in U.S. history and see how extraordinary leaders in politics and the press arose to meet a similar challenge. Fortunately, historian Doris Kearns Goodwin does all that in this excellent examination of the lives of Theodore Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, and the muckraking journalists of McClure's that did so much to bolster the Progressive cause of the early 20th century.

Ms. Goodwin starts with the lives of Theodore Roosevelt and William Howard Taft, two men of drastically different temperaments, and how their strong friendship supported each other for much of their careers. As a longtime fan of Theodore Roosevelt, Doris Kearns Goodwin travels some rather well-trodden ground for me. With the exception of Theodore Roosevelt's second wife and longtime friend, Edith Carrow, Ms. Goodwin does not reveal much about TR that you couldn't have already found in other biographies. But when she turns to examining Taft's life, that is where this book really starts to pick up. Sadly, history has not been kind to Taft. Too often he has been overshadowed by his famous presidential predecessor, TR. But Ms. Goodwin does a tremendous job of revealing the true Taft to readers who may not be as familiar with him. The contrasting images of TR and Taft reveal that while TR was more combative, passionate, and stubborn, Taft was far more fair-minded, affable, and efficient even when he procrastinated. Indeed, Taft shines as the far more likable of the two presidents in this book. Ms. Goodwin's charting of their relationship's rise and fall is at the very heart of this book and that eventual fall is just as heartbreaking as you would expect.

While the two presidents make up the bulk of this book, another key element is the Progressive "muckraking" journalists that gathered around S.S. McClure's magazine, McClure's. The famous journalists Ida Tarbell, Lincoln Steffens, William Allen White, and Ray Stannard Baker all played a critical role in exposing the corruption of the different business trusts and political machines that had been choking the civic life out of the nation at that time. Indeed, Ms. Goodwin makes an effective case that, without McClure's and the top-notch investigative journalism it pioneered, TR would not have been nearly as successful as he became. Indeed, she strongly hints that, without McClure's, TR would not have had enough popular support to win the Republican nomination and then the presidency in his own right in 1904.

With these three moving parts, it would be a difficult juggling act for anyone. And, unfortunately, it appears at times to be too much for Ms. Goodwin too. Several times it felt as though these three storylines were disconnected from each other. This is especially true just before the beginning of McClure's golden age in the mid-1900s to the end of that time when S.S. McClure's manic mood swings and extra marital affairs would destroy the partnerships that made McClure and his journalists so successful. On top of that, the heart of this book is TR and Taft's friendship, but Ms. Goodwin rarely gives us any insight into how their relationship became so close despite the fact that these were two men of such vastly different talents and temperaments, though not entirely of politics (which might be a surprise to some). Not until the end does Ms. Goodwin really give us an image of TR and Taft as friends rather than really good office partners. But, when all three of these things do come together right around the middle of the book, when you see the muckrakers digging up and exposing corruption, TR providing the moral clarity and political leadership, and Taft faithfully executing TR's vision, the narrative is dynamite. It makes one nostalgic for a time when journalists were respected and their exposures of corruption were not only more frequent, but could make serious waves in politics.

The 700+ narrative pages may be daunting at first glance. But, for those who are interested in the combination of investigative journalism and Progressive politics, who are looking for solutions to our present predicaments by studying our past, this is a book well worth your time and effort. I highly recommend this book to fans of Theodore Roosevelt and the Progressive era or who desire motivation for our current political times.

Popular Posts

Search This Blog